You have policies, a risk register and audit reports, and still can't say what would stop a breach. We tie your controls to the threats that are real for your business, and to the obligations (CPS 230 and CPS 234, SOCI and CIRMP, and the rest) that now come with board accountability.
GRC is usually a checkbox exercise: policies written for the auditor, controls installed because a framework lists them, a risk register nobody opens. We start from the threats instead. The controls you end up with are the ones that stop the attacks you would face, and the framework mapping is done afterwards.
Continuous Threat and Exposure Management (CTEM) keeps a live map of your external attack surface, finds what is exploitable, and orders the fixes by risk. Add Cloud Posture Management and you also see the cloud misconfigurations, with the context to fix them in the right order.
You end up with a governance programme that lowers risk, policies people follow, and a security team that can explain what matters and why. We also keep your frameworks current: ASD has confirmed the Essential Eight will be retired for the new Essentials series over roughly 24 months, and we align uplift work so it counts under both.
Continuous visibility into cloud misconfigurations and vulnerabilities across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Alerts you can act on, ordered by risk.
Continuous external attack surface discovery and exposure management. Know what an attacker would see and find, and fix it first.
Practical, usable security policies aligned to your frameworks and risk appetite. Policies people can follow.
Critical operations mapping, the material service provider register, tolerance levels, scenario testing and BCP. The transitional relief ended on 1 July 2026, so this is now the standard in full.
The Enhanced CIRMP Rules commenced on 10 June 2026. Directors must approve the program, set the risk appetite and receive ongoing cyber-risk reporting. The first obligations fall due on 10 June 2027, the rest on 10 June 2028, and energy operators must reach AESCSF MIL-2 across all domains by 30 June 2028. We take responsible entities from "the rules changed" to a program the board can sign.
Where your current program stands against the enhanced rules, and a costed, sequenced path to the 2027 and 2028 deadlines.
The annual report directors must approve, the risk appetite statement behind it, and reporting that tells the board what is happening. Directors are personally on the hook now, and ignoring a Ministerial direction can cost the company up to $3.3 million.
A practical program to reach AESCSF MIL-2 by 30 June 2028, prioritised by what an assessor will test and what an attacker will try.
Policies nobody reads. Compliance programmes that do not lower risk. Frameworks out of date before they are rolled out. We have seen plenty of each, and we do not build them.
Our approach is practical: policies people can follow, controls that map to the threats you face, frameworks that move when your threats do. The result is governance that works.
Controls are chosen from the threats in your environment. The framework mapping follows.
Your risk posture is monitored in real time, not in annual audits.
Policies are written so that teams understand them and can follow them without struggle.
Good governance speeds delivery up. Done badly it is only a compliance tax.
Starting from scratch, tightening what you have, or rolling out CSPM and CTEM tooling: we can help you build governance that lowers risk.